HRJust & COVID
Examines how human rights justifications appear across different national Covid strategies—from voluntary measures to strict controls. By engaging with civil society, it identifies risks, benefits, and gaps in individual human rights protection when human rights justifications are used during times of crisis.
READ MORE
HRJust & Migration
Explores how States use human rights justifications to defend and legitimize its migration policies and legislation. With a focus on how this affects the individual human rights protection of migrants and persons with migrant backgrounds. Through dialogue with human rights defenders and NGOs, it highlights geopolitical, gender, and intersectional impacts on rights protection.
READ MORE
HRJust & Climate
Studies how States use human rights to justify climate policies. It assesses whether these justifications strengthen accountability or leave people unprotected, and develops recommendations for fair and rights-based climate governance.
READ MORE
Theoretical Framework
An HRJust-developed theory explaining how states use human rights to defend decisions and legislation that often limit individual rights. This shifts the purpose of human rights from protecting individuals from the state to protecting the state itself. Our theoretical framework draws from disciplines such as law, philosophy, and political theory.
READ MORE
Complex Intersectionality
An HRJust developed concept for analyzing gender and intersectionality through Covid, Migration and Climate where we merge the theories of gender and intersectionality with vulnerability theory. This is done through an interdisciplinary approach between sociology, anthropology and law, and we call this concept Complex Intersectionality.
READ MORE